This leads me to several different scenarios:
Do I pass down a liner through the chimney, but not connect it directly to the exhaust port of the furnace?
Do I connect to existing machinery with a 6" liner or a 7" liner? If I connect with a 7" liner and later have to replace the furnace, am I faced with having to replace the 7" liner with a 6" liner so as to fit the new exhaust?
Do I preemptively replace the furnace and the liner at the same time? My furnace is approximately 15-20 years old, but has been well-maintained and currently has no real problems.
As a bit of history, I currently own my house outright and WILL be moving within five years to a different location entirely. I do not want to sink any money into this house that is not necessary. I absolutely want to ensure that my furnace operates safely so I don’t just camouflage problems so I can sell my problems to someone else. I also want an honest job done for a reasonable price.
Could you offer me your opinion of which option to focus on?"
ADVICE FROM CSA’S TECHNICAL DIRECTOR - If you go with the 7" liner, and the sizing charts allows it, then that would be a reduction of only one size. When you go to sell your home, this reduction of one size from the previous 8" liner could be justified with sizing charts. The building inspectors will often allow for a reduction of one size if it is an engineered system.
If you have occasion to change out the furnace, the 7" would be a step up of only one size and it should work just fine. You might consider having the flue insulated to reduce condensation inside the flue, especially with the future new appliance that would be a higher efficiency unit.